A bill proposing Nigeria’s return to a regional system of government has sparked outrage and deepened divisions across the nation. Senate Majority Leader Opeyemi Bamidele, leading the pro-President Tinubu group, vehemently rejected the bill, claiming it could lead to dangerous secessionist movements, particularly in the South East. “If we allow a regional system in Nigeria, we would have effectively granted the Easterners Biafra,” Bamidele stated.
The controversial bill, which was spearheaded by Akin Fapohunda of the Yoruba socio-cultural group Afenifere, seeks to revert Nigeria to a pre-1967 regional structure, dividing the nation into eight geopolitical regions. While proponents argue this system would ensure greater regional autonomy and equity, critics fear it could embolden separatist movements like the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB).
The bill was presented to President Tinubu despite being disowned by the House of Representatives. Fapohunda’s proposed governance model envisions regions governing themselves, creating sub-entities, and having more autonomy over their resources. However, the Senate’s opposition reflects a growing fear among federal lawmakers that such a move could destabilize Nigeria’s fragile unity, especially amid rising ethnic and regional tensions.
Bamidele’s statement has inflamed an already tense situation, particularly in the South East, where calls for Biafra’s independence have gained momentum. The debate over regionalism highlights the enduring struggles of Nigeria’s federalism, with both proponents and opponents of the bill sharply divided on how best to govern the country.
Peoplesmind