By Fattykolly Ibn Alimi
This is a very salient question whose answer would vary based on our different understandings of the world immorality.
By my own understanding, immorality is the quality of not being in accord with standards of right or good conduct. Immorality is evil, sinful, or otherwise wickedness and wrong behavior that has to do with one’s way of life, but not necessarily the way we dress. And I can show this:
A woman who dresses so decently as a lady but can’t stop sleeping around, isn’t that immoral? A man who dresses in “Jalabia” and still fond of sleeping with people wives within a society, isn’t that immoral too? These go on to prove that our modes of dressing do not necessarily define our inner self.
The way Bobrisky dresses doesn’t make him immoral, my opinion though. Some even confused him to a gay or homosexual! I am confused also if these set of people truly can’t differentiate between a crossdresser and a gay/homosexual.
It is an open secret that several gays out there do not necessarily dress the way of Bobrisky, I am sure we know that too well. They dress like us and hide under many guises to portray themselves as what they are not. As a matter of fact, Bobrisky would have been picked up by security operatives if he is a gay, but they spared him because he is not. He only dresses his own way to satisfy himself. He holds that right as an individual. He is not crossing the path of anyone and has never been our source of poor living and societal problems.
It is strange how the society overlook many who commit heavy sins only to start looking for scapegoats from the few who had only committed unharmful, social sins. Bobrisky only dresses like a woman, not naked. Why are we taking thing too far?
Peoplesmind